Hippocampal and amygdala subfield volumes in obsessive-compulsive disorder by medication status
- Journal
- Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience
- Vol
- 50(3)
- Page
- E170-E180
- Year
- 2025
- Link
- https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.230119 47회 연결
Background: Although it has been suggested that the hippocampus and amygdala (HA) are involved in the neurobiology of obsessive–
compulsive disorder (OCD), volumetric findings have been inconsistent, and little work has been undertaken on the volumetry of the
heterogeneous
anatomic units of HA, with their specific functions and cytoarchitecture, in OCD. We sought to explore potential sources
of heterogeneity in brain volumes by performing a separate analysis for people with and without psychotropic medication use, as well as
the association of subfield volumes with OCD symptom severity. Methods: We segmented T1-weighted images from people with OCD
and healthy controls in the OCD Brain Imaging Consortium to produce 12 hippocampal subfields and 9 amygdala subfields using Free-
Surfer 6.0. We assessed between-group differences in subfield volume using a mixed-effects model adjusted for age and quadratic effects
of age, sex, site, and whole HA volume. We also performed subgroup analyses to examine subfield volume in relation to comorbid
anxiety and depression, medication status, and symptom severity. We corrected all analyses for multiple comparisons using the false
discovery rate (FDR). Results: We included images from 381 people with OCD and 338 healthy controls. These groups did not significantly
differ in HA subfield volumes. However, medicated people with OCD had significantly smaller volumes in the hippocampal dentate
gyrus (pFDR = 0.04, d = –0.26) and molecular layer (pFDR = 0.04, d = –0.29), and larger volumes in the lateral (pFDR = 0.049, d = 0.23) and
basal (pFDR = 0.049, d = 0.25) amygdala subfields, than healthy controls. Unmedicated people with OCD had significantly smaller volumes
in the hippocampal cornu ammonis sector 1 (pFDR = 0.02, d = –0.28) than controls. We did not detect associations between any
subfield volume and OCD severity. Limitations: We used cross-sectional data, which limits the interpretation of our analysis.
Conclusion:
Differences in HA subfields between people with OCD and healthy controls are dependent on medication status, in line
with previous work on other brain volumetric alterations in OCD. This emphasizes the importance of considering psychotropic medication
in neuroimaging studies of OCD.
